Say you become aware that a company/organization is committing fraud. Not just a little dishonesty, but massive fraud. You know the right thing to do is to expose them; but the only way is to steal and make public the necessary document. Morally, do you have a right to take these documents? Morally, do you have a choice not to?

Recently hundreds of files were hacked and published from Britain's Climate Research Unit (CRU). The CRU is one of the principal advocates of global warming. It is reported that this was a decade’s worth of data; so far consisting of 1000 e-mails and 3000 documents. The contents of these emails and documents are proving that the "scientist" behind this global warming hoax have known all along that the actual science/data does not support their theory. They and their co-conspirators are frauds. 

There was no other way that this information would have come to light; and for this reason we owe the anonymous hackers a debt of gratitude.

Of course the "scientist" can't directly dispute the facts now presented in their own writings; so they have no choice but to attack the messenger; even an anonymous one. So what hysterics are we hearing...?

1. The hackers only released the e-mails/documents that help undermine the global warming theory.

   Answer: This is the old "out of context" argument we see so often. If this were true the "scientist" could easily refute the damaging documents by releasing ALL the documents. Don't hold your breath.

2. It's political; right before the Copenhagen debate.

   Answer: OK... it's political... It's still the truth... You're still a fraud.

3. I've been violated, they had no right to take and distribute my personal emails/documents.

   Answer: Yes, you were violated. So were Enron executives. You're breaking my heart.

I'm sure there are more whining points I have missed, but be assured that none of them will actually address the facts found in the documents.

Just one of the examples of deception involved the CRU's director, Phil Jones, writing that he had used a "trick" to "hide the decline" in charts detailing global temperatures. Translation; He took the lies and dam lies and hid them in statistics. Of course, I'm sure he was taken our of context, misunderstood, yada yada yada...

Will this be enough to finally bring down the global warming (now climate change) hysteria? I doubt it. This vehicle has already been co-opted by the left on a global basis to implement their socialist/secular agenda; and they know they can count on the lap-dog old media to keep this as hushed as possible.

But as George Orwell once said, "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Viva la Revolucion!

Several of the 911 war criminals will now be tried in New York.  This is nothing but a political move by the Obama administration, particularly Attorney General Eric Holder.  The left wants more than anything else to put the Bush administration on trial; for the pseudo-torture techniques (water-boarding) that kept America safe for the extent of the Bush term in office (7 years).  And either they haven't thought the price through or have decided that any price is acceptable.

In times of war, you don't bring your enemy home and afford them civil rights guaranteed under your constitution.  Can you imagine doing this for German, Japan, and Italy after WWII.  This is a military matter; and should be dealt with by the military.  But the Obama administration despises the military.

For what they hope is political gain; the Obama administration is willing to:
1. Put the people of New York city at much greater risk of terrorist attack.
2. Subject the families of 911 to a circus of trials the likes of which we haven't seen since O. J. Simpson
3. Grant the 911 terrorist their greatest wish... a stage of spout and spread their jihad.
4. Give terrorist abroad 4-6 years of recruiting material.
5. Broadcast to our enemies our intelligence gathering techniques and endanger our agents abroad.
6. Further confirm to the world view that this President is weak and through him the U.S. is weak as well.

Does Obama think this will show the world that we are a noble & just nation?  Does he think the world will love us more for coddling enemies responsible for killing thousands?  I have a poor opinion of Obama, Holder, and the rest; but stupid they are not.  Again, this is all about political retribution; but how they can justify the best and worst case scenarios of the price are beyond me.

Nothing good can come of this.  First I pray that we somehow avoid the consequences.  But if the consequences come, I just hope the American people hold Obama and the Left responsible.

The World Council of Churches, the Council of Christian and Orthodox Churches, and the Council of European Bishops Conferences recently called on churches to ring their bells 350 times during the Copenhagen climate change summit on December 13 as a call to action on global warming.

"On that Sunday, midway through the UN summit, the WCC invites churches around the world to use their bells, drums, gongs or whatever their tradition offers to call people to prayer and action in the face of climate change.  By sounding their bells or other instruments 350 times, participating churches will symbolize the 350 parts per million that mark the safe upper limit for CO2 (carbon dioxide) in the atmosphere according to many scientists."

It saddens and sickens me when "churches" support and promote this crap; global warming being just one of the many golden calves they bow down to.

These hypocrites argue they are protecting God's creation; but what they are protecting and promoting is a secular socialist agenda and even worse, a pagan (earth worship) ideology. There will be a price to pay.

John 4:5 (New International Version)
They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them.

In an appearance at a Florida senior center, Nancy Pelosi referred to the so-called public option as "the consumer option." Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Florida Democrat, appeared by Pelosi's side and used the term "competitive option."

Don't you just love it when a politician has so little respect for you (the American people) that they treat you like a two-year-old. They actually believe that the children/serfs who have just rejected a turd presented to them by the ruling class will not recognize it as the same turd if they just add sprinkles and give it a new name. Do we really want people who have so much contempt for us to have any power what-so-ever?

BREAKING: Obama wins "Survivor" reality show! President Obama has just been awarded the one million dollar prize and the honor of being the Ultimate Survivor without even having been to Samoa or participating in any challenges. The actual contestants were told to just "go home" by Jeff Probst after it was determined by show producers that president Obama had outwitted and outplayed them all in one genius stroke of complete non-action on his part.

One can only wonder why we have yet to hear from the producers of The Amazing Race, Dancing with the Stars, Iron Chef, the Pillsbury Bake-Off, or the Kentucky Derby.

-- half plagiarized from a posting on the Internet...Lynn J.